← All hiring scorecards

Hiring scorecard

Finance Hire Scorecard

What to screen for in early finance hires — controllership vs FP&A vs strategic finance, depth of accounting fundamentals, and the signals that matter at small-company stage.

Last updated May 4, 2026

Role overview

"Finance" is three different jobs. Decide which you are actually hiring for before reviewing applicants.

  • Controllership / Accounting: closes the books, manages audit, owns systems of record. Detail-oriented. Process-heavy.
  • FP&A (Financial Planning & Analysis): builds the model, owns budget vs. actuals, runs forecasts.
  • Strategic Finance: works on capital strategy, board materials, fundraising support, business cases.

Lean teams sometimes need someone who can do all three. Be honest about that in the JD — full-stack finance hires are rare and command premium pay.

Job criteria

  • Background appropriate to the function (CPA / chartered accountant for controllership; banking / consulting / strategic finance for FP&A and strategic)
  • Industry overlap (SaaS, marketplace, hardware, regulated, etc.)
  • Stage overlap — Series A finance is not the same as public-company finance
  • Strong Excel / Sheets modeling capability — ask for a sample
  • Familiarity with the relevant systems (NetSuite, QuickBooks, Xero, Workday, Anaplan, depending on stage)
  • For strategic / FP&A: a portfolio of board-grade artifacts they can talk to

What to screen for

  • Function clarity. Read the resume for which of the three jobs they have actually done — not which titles they have held.
  • Modeling depth. Ask for a model. Resume claims about "built financial model" mean nothing without seeing one.
  • Stage match. A controller at a 2,000-person company will likely be miserable at a 30-person one, and vice versa.
  • CPA / qualification rigor for controllership-leaning roles.
  • Communication quality for FP&A and strategic — most of the job is translating numbers into a story for non-finance people.

Red flags

  • "Finance leader" titles with no controllership or FP&A specialization arc
  • No model attached / refusal to share a sanitized sample
  • Resume describes activities ("managed budget") rather than outputs (variance to plan, savings, forecast accuracy)
  • Heavy reliance on consultants or external accountants for activities that should be in-house
  • Stage mismatch the candidate is unaware of ("scaled processes" experience that is mostly applicable to far larger companies)

Resume keywords

GAAP, IFRS, month-end close, audit, revenue recognition, ASC 606, controllership, financial reporting, FP&A, budget vs actuals, forecasting, three-statement model, cash forecasting, scenario modeling, board materials, board reporting, NetSuite, QuickBooks, Xero, Workday Adaptive, Anaplan, Mosaic

Interview questions

  1. Walk me through your last month-end close. What broke, and what did you change?
  2. Show me a model you built. Why this structure?
  3. Tell me about a number you got wrong in front of leadership. What happened, and what did you change next time?
  4. How do you size a hiring plan against a runway constraint?
  5. We are at <stage / industry>. Where in your career has the work shape been closest, and where is the gap?
  6. (Strategic / FP&A) Walk me through how you would build the next board deck for our company.

Reviewing applicants for this role?

Use this scorecard in Reordinal to summarize, score, and compare candidates from LinkedIn Easy Apply.

Built for sensitive hiring workflows.

Reordinal is designed for teams reviewing real candidate data.

  • No LinkedIn password required
  • Manual import from workflows you control
  • Candidate data is not sold
  • AI supports review, not final hiring decisions
  • Human judgment stays in control
  • Team access and permissions
  • Data export available